It's 2am in the morning but I have to get this off my mind.
Recently, my beloved former high school went through a lock down. If you are familiar with the Malaysian Education system, all students are required to attend a uniform body, sports practice and a club. I've always been pro-extra-curricular activities so I never really saw a problem with this ruling. Scouts and CF after all do hold special places in my heart.
Anyway, today was the day uniform bodies have their meetings and for the first time, nobody was allowed outside school. The school no longer wanted to tolerate poor attendance in meetings. From what my sister told me today, it was like 'school was a prison and there were attempted mass breakouts' Liiyung texted me just now telling me about the incident and how I felt about it -impartial by the way. She felt the same. However, a lot of the alumni and the students have said that this is preposterous, stupid and just plain bullsh*t.
But is it fair to put the blame entirely on the school? When DJ has one of the lowest attendance records in the state? Could they just sit there forever and watch their co-curricular activities slowly rot? If I recall correctly, my year in scouts and CF was a miserable year in terms of attendance and involvement. People my year just didn't see any point attending scouts (there were 5 of us only) and Christians just didn't see any need to be part of the school CF (the biggest club in the school) except for about 8-10 of us. And let me make it clear, my year consisted of over 300 students. Measures had to be taken. I remember my previous Senior Assistant saying that DJ would never resort to this. Clearly, their options have been exhausted out.
But was it right for the school to impose such a ruling? Did they violate the student's right to attend whenever he/she pleases? There are those who say that forcing a student to attend dying clubs will not help the situation. How true is that? Five years ago, I would have never imagined I would end up attending CF. But last year, I stepped down as a committee member. Attending CF sparked my interest in it and so could it perhaps apply to other clubs as well? There are clubs in the school overflowing with potential. But because of the lack of passionate people, they are on their deathbeds.
There are some who say attendance is not the true measure of the quality of a club. Yes, but before a club can get started, there MUST be people attending it yes? Still, they argue back saying that students should be allowed to attend (or not attend) whatever club they please. That's true, but the compulsory attendance was not the school's idea. It was the Education Ministry's. And as long as this rule is imposed, and as long as co-curricular attendance continues to deteriorate, our poor Senior Assistant will have to endure someone high up telling him/her every year that his/her school has the lowest co-curricular attendance in the state probably implying that you've failed as a Senior Assistant. Humiliation is never a nice feeling. So any problem with compulsory attendance should be brought up to the Education Ministry, not the school.
There are some who say the whole system is flawed anyway so why bother? Well, I do admit that's true but our school syllabus -in my opinion- is equally as flawed too. But we study anyway. We aim for the straight A* s even though we know that our syllabus is screwed up.
There are some who say that the school should let us run our own clubs. I agree with that but this is, for the time being, unachievable. Why? Students don't attend co-curricular activities because they see no point or they don't have the time, And when they can't even have the discipline to ATTEND something, how can they ever dream of even STARTING something?
Personally, I think the root cause of this whole problem was the diminishing love of co-curricular activities in students, which is what the Education Ministry should be looking at. What caused this? The overemphasis of exam results (hence resulting in excessive amounts of tuition thus causing less time)? The lazy attitude? The 'it's a waste of time' -DOTA is a waste of time btw-attitude? The fear of venturing into new things?
Also, teachers should take an initiative. You want students to attend but do you bother making the club productive/fun? Just last year, 4 hour scout meetings on Saturdays were changed to 2 hour meetings on Wednesdays. Why? TEACHER'S DIDN'T WANT TO SPEND THEIR SATURDAY MORNINGS IN SCHOOL. Honestly, we couldn't do much in 2 hours. We couldn't do backwoods let alone pioneering. We only had time for test sessions, knots and games. In addition to that, everyone was tired out from a long day of school and some were late for meetings because of extra classes. The Court of Honour (which I was part of) was obviously against this but there was nothing we could do. Though I continued to attend, meetings weren't the same anymore.
Can't really point fingers here now, can we?